Login / Signup

Idiopathic Megacolon-Short Review.

Adrian ConstantinFlorin AchimDan SpinuBogdan SoceaDragos Predescu
Published in: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2021)
If the diagnosis of megacolon is made relatively easily by imaging the colorectal dilation (which is associated with initial and/or consecutive clinical aspects), the establishing of the diagnosis of idiopathic megacolon is based in practice almost exclusively on a principle of exclusion, and after evaluating the absence of some known causes that can lead to the occurrence of these anatomic and clinical changes, mimetically, clinically, and paraclinically, with IM (intramural aganglionosis, distal obstructions, intoxications, etc.). If the etiopathogenic theories, based on an increase in the performance of the arsenal of investigations of the disease, have registered a continuous improvement and an increase of objectivity, unfortunately, the curative surgical treatment options still revolve around the same resection techniques. Moreover, the possibility of developing a form of etiopathogenic treatment seems as remote as ever.
Keyphrases
  • primary care
  • healthcare
  • risk assessment
  • high resolution
  • minimally invasive
  • prognostic factors
  • mass spectrometry
  • rectal cancer
  • quality improvement
  • fluorescence imaging