Login / Signup

Standardizing the classification of skin tears: validity and reliability testing of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel Classification System in 44 countries.

Hanne Van TiggelenK LeBlancK CampbellK WooS BaranoskiY Y ChangA M DunkM GloecknerH HeviaS HollowayP IdensohnA KaradağE KorenJan KottnerD LangemoK OuseyA PokornáM RomanelliV L C G SantosS SmetG TariqKaren Van den BusscheAnn Van HeckeSofie VerhaegheH VuagnatA WilliamsDimitri Beeckman
Published in: The British journal of dermatology (2019)
The ISTAP Classification System is supported by evidence for validity and reliability. The ISTAP Classification System should be used for systematic assessment and reporting of skin tears in clinical practice and research globally. What's already known about this topic? Skin tears are common acute wounds that are misdiagnosed and under-reported too often. A skin tear classification system is needed to standardize documentation and description for clinical practice, audit and research. What does this study add? The International Skin Tear Advisory Panel Classification System was psychometrically tested in 1601 healthcare professionals from 44 countries. Diagnostic accuracy was high when differentiating between type 1, 2 and 3 skin tears using a set of validated photographs.
Keyphrases
  • soft tissue
  • wound healing
  • clinical practice
  • rotator cuff
  • intensive care unit
  • magnetic resonance
  • deep learning
  • hepatitis b virus
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • drug induced
  • mechanical ventilation