Login / Signup

Standardization of molecular monitoring of CML: results and recommendations from the European treatment and outcome study.

Helen E WhiteMatthew SalmonFrancesco AlbanoChristina Søs Auður AndersenStefan BalabanovGueorgui BalatzenkoGisela BarbanyJean-Michel CayuelaNuno CerveiraPascale CochauxDolors ColomerDaniel CoriuJoana DiamondChristian DietzStephanie DulucqMarie EngvallGeorg N FrankeEgle Gineikiene-ValentineMichał GniotMaría Teresa Gómez-CasaresEnrico GottardiChloe HaydenSandrine HayetteAndreas HedblomAnca IleaBarbara IzzoAntonio Jiménez-VelascoTomas JurcekVeli KairistoStephen E LangabeerThomas LionNora MeggyesiSemir MešanovićLuboslav MihokGerlinde Mitterbauer-HohendannerSylvia MoeckelNicole NaumannOlivier NibourelElisabeth Oppliger LeibundgutPanayiotis PanayiotidisHelena PodgornikChristiane PottInmaculada RapadoSusan J RoseVivien SchäferTasoula TouloumenidouChristopher VeigaardBianca Venniker-PuntClaudia VenturiPaolo VigneriIngvild VorkinnElizabeth WilkinsonRenata ZadroMagdalena ZawadaHana ZizkovaMartin C MüllerSusanne SausseleThomas ErnstKaterina Machova PolakovaAndreas HochhausNicholas C P Cross
Published in: Leukemia (2022)
Standardized monitoring of BCR::ABL1 mRNA levels is essential for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. From 2016 to 2021 the European Treatment and Outcome Study for CML (EUTOS) explored the use of secondary, lyophilized cell-based BCR::ABL1 reference panels traceable to the World Health Organization primary reference material to standardize and validate local laboratory tests. Panels were used to assign and validate conversion factors (CFs) to the International Scale and assess the ability of laboratories to assess deep molecular response (DMR). The study also explored aspects of internal quality control. The percentage of EUTOS reference laboratories (n = 50) with CFs validated as optimal or satisfactory increased from 67.5% to 97.6% and 36.4% to 91.7% for ABL1 and GUSB, respectively, during the study period and 98% of laboratories were able to detect MR 4.5 in most samples. Laboratories with unvalidated CFs had a higher coefficient of variation for BCR::ABL1 IS and some laboratories had a limit of blank greater than zero which could affect the accurate reporting of DMR. Our study indicates that secondary reference panels can be used effectively to obtain and validate CFs in a manner equivalent to sample exchange and can also be used to monitor additional aspects of quality assurance.
Keyphrases
  • chronic myeloid leukemia
  • tyrosine kinase
  • acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • quality control
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • single cell
  • binding protein
  • cell therapy