A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery.
Ilana N AckermanSze-Ee SohBrian R HallstromYi Ying FangPatricia FranklinJörg LütznerLina Holm Holm Ingelsrudnull nullPublished in: Acta orthopaedica (2024)
This is the first synthesis of published crosswalks for converting joint-specific (OHS, OKS, HOOS, KOOS), disease-specific (WOMAC), and generic PROMs scores (PROMIS-Physical Function, UCLA Activity Scale, Lower Extremity Activity Scale) used to assess joint replacement outcomes, providing a resource for data harmonization and pooled analysis. Crosswalks were developed using regression methods (9 studies), equipercentile equating methods (5 studies), a combination of equipercentile equating and item response theory methods (2 studies), and a combination of regression and equipercentile equating methods (1 study). A range of crosswalk validation approaches were adopted, including the use of external datasets, separate samples or subsets, follow-up data from additional time points, or bootstrapped samples. Efforts are needed to standardize crosswalk methodology and achieve consistent reporting.
Keyphrases
- emergency department
- patient reported outcomes
- case control
- electronic health record
- minimally invasive
- total knee arthroplasty
- metabolic syndrome
- peripheral blood
- knee osteoarthritis
- coronary artery bypass
- rna seq
- quality improvement
- weight loss
- acute coronary syndrome
- single cell
- insulin resistance
- psychometric properties
- meta analyses