Login / Signup

Roses and Balances: A Paradigm for Constructive Ethical Review of Health Professions Education Research.

Tim SchutteFedde ScheeleScheltus van Luijk
Published in: Advances in medical education and practice (2021)
Recently, the balance between value and necessity of ethical review of health professions education research has been debated. At present, there are large differences in how ethical review of research proposals for health professions education is organized. We present a framework that describes the organization of ethical review in health professions education research, based on the interpersonal circumplex model, also known as Leary's Rose. The framework is based on the two main balances in ethical review of health professions education research, being the protectiveness for the subjects and how ethical review is organized and responsibilities are shared. The axis/balance of protectiveness ranges between the extremes "paternalistic protective" to "liberal permissive". The axis/balance of organization and responsibility ranges between the extremes of "centralized" to "local/decentralized". This model offers insight in the position of an ethical review board and shows the dynamics of the decisions for ethical approval and the consequences of the different approaches to the organization of ethical review of health professions education research.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • mental health
  • health information
  • decision making
  • quality improvement
  • climate change
  • health promotion
  • social media