Login / Signup

Prior information differentially affects discrimination decisions and subjective confidence reports.

Marika ConstantMichael PereiraNathan FaivreElisa Filevich
Published in: Nature communications (2023)
According to Bayesian models, both decisions and confidence are based on the same precision-weighted integration of prior expectations ("priors") and incoming information ("likelihoods"). This assumes that priors are integrated optimally and equally in decisions and confidence, which has not been tested. In three experiments, we quantify how priors inform decisions and confidence. With a dual-decision task we create pairs of conditions that are matched in posterior information, but differ on whether the prior or likelihood is more informative. We find that priors are underweighted in discrimination decisions, but are less underweighted in confidence about those decisions, and this is not due to differences in processing time. The same patterns remain with exogenous probabilistic cues as priors. With a Bayesian model we quantify the weighting parameters for the prior at both levels, and find converging evidence that priors are more optimally used in explicit confidence, even when underused in decisions.
Keyphrases
  • magnetic resonance
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • physical activity
  • depressive symptoms
  • social media
  • sleep quality
  • electronic health record