Contrast media viscosity and its potential effect on the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in children.

Question Why are there differences in detecting and grading VUR between ceVUS and VCUG? Finding VUR was detected by ceVUS or VCUG only in, respectively 38.8% and 5.5% of PUUs. VUR grade was higher with ceVUS in 63.3%. Clinical relevance The higher detection rate and grading of vesicoureteral reflux in children by ceVUS might be explained by the lower viscosity of its sonographic contrast agent. CeVUS might reproduce the urine movement in the urinary tract.