Evaluating water quality benefits of manureshed management in the Susquehanna River Basin.

'Manureshed' management guides the sustainable use of manure resources by matching areas of crop demand (nutrient sinks) with areas generating livestock manure (nutrient sources). A better understanding of the impacts of manureshed management on water quality within sensitive watersheds is needed. We quantified the potential water quality benefits of manureshed-oriented management through scenario-based analyses in the Susquehanna River Basin (SRB) using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Five manureshed management scenarios were developed and compared with a baseline "business-as-usual" scenario. The baseline assumes manure is less transportable, which means some locations have manure application in excess of crop demand. The "watershed nutrient balance" scenarios assume excess manure from surplus locations are transportable, and manure is applied around the SRB based on crop nutrient demand. The "watershed nutrient balance avoiding runoff prone areas" scenarios assume manure is transportable but not applied in vulnerable landscapes of the SRB. Each scenario was evaluated under two application rates considering crop nitrogen demand (N-based) and phosphorus demand (P-based). P-based manureshed management was more effective in water quality improvements than N-based. P-based nutrient balance scenarios simulated 3% and 25% reduction in TN and TP from the baseline scenario at the watershed outlet. The N- and P-based scenarios avoiding runoff prone areas simulated 3% and 6% reduction in TN loss, and 4% and 25.2% reduction in TP loss respectively from the baseline. Overall, the manureshed management scenarios were more effective in improving the quality of local streams in livestock-intensive regions than at the watershed outlet. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.