Login / Signup

Comparison of Prophylactic Effects between Localized Biomimetic Minocycline and Systematic Amoxicillin on Implants Placed Immediately in Infected Sockets.

Won-Woo LeeJin-Won SeoIl-Seok JangYoung-Joong KwonWon-Jun JoungJong-Hun JunJiyeong KimDonghee SonSeung-Weon LimSeo-Hyoung YunMarco TallaricoChang-Joo Park
Published in: Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) (2023)
This study evaluated the prophylactic effect of localized biomimetic minocycline and systemic amoxicillin on immediate implant placement at infected extraction sites. Twelve mongrels with six implants each were randomly assigned to five groups: uninfected negative control (Group N); infected with oral complex bacteria (Group P); infected and treated with amoxicillin one hour before implant placement (Group A); infected and treated with minocycline during implant placement (Group B); and infected and treated with amoxicillin one hour before implant placement and with minocycline during implant placement (Group C). Radiographic bone level, gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), papillary bleeding index (PBI), and removal torque (RT) were recorded. There was no significant difference between Groups A, B, and C for bone loss. Group A showed the highest RT, the lowest PBI, and significantly lower GI and PD values than Group P. Group B exhibited significantly higher RT value than Group N and significantly smaller PD value than Group P at 6 w postoperatively. Localized minocycline could improve implant success by reducing bone loss and increasing RT and systemic amoxicillin could maintain the stability of the peri-implant soft tissue. However, combined use of these two antibiotics did not augment the prophylactic effect.
Keyphrases
  • soft tissue
  • bone loss
  • ultrasound guided
  • blood pressure
  • atrial fibrillation
  • optical coherence tomography
  • body composition
  • single molecule