Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Combined with NGS Panel Testing Increases Accuracy in Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk Estimation.
Nikolaos TsoulosEirini PapadopoulouKonstantinos AgiannitopoulosDimitrios GrigoriadisGeorgios N TsaousisDimitra BouzarelouHelen J GogasTheodore TroupisVassileios VenizelosElena FountzilasMaria TheochariDimitrios C ZiogasStylianos GiassasAnna KoumarianouAthina ChristopoulouGeorge B J BusbyGeorge NasioulasChristos MarkopoulosPublished in: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2024)
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prominent tumor type among women, accounting for 32% of newly diagnosed cancer cases. BC risk factors include inherited germline pathogenic gene variants and family history of disease. However, the etiology of the disease remains occult in most cases. Therefore, in the absence of high-risk factors, a polygenic basis has been suggested to contribute to susceptibility. This information is utilized to calculate the Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) which is indicative of BC risk. This study aimed to evaluate retrospectively the clinical usefulness of PRS integration in BC risk calculation, utilizing a group of patients who have already been diagnosed with BC. The study comprised 105 breast cancer patients with hereditary genetic analysis results obtained by NGS. The selection included all testing results: high-risk gene-positive, intermediate/low-risk gene-positive, and negative. PRS results were obtained from an external laboratory (Allelica). PRS-based BC risk was computed both with and without considering additional risk factors, including gene status and family history. A significantly different PRS percentile distribution consistent with higher BC risk was observed in our cohort compared to the general population. Higher PRS-based BC risks were detected in younger patients and in those with FH of cancers. Among patients with a pathogenic germline variant detected, reduced PRS values were observed, while the BC risk was mainly determined by a monogenic etiology. Upon comprehensive analysis encompassing FH, gene status, and PRS, it was determined that 41.90% (44/105) of the patients demonstrated an elevated susceptibility for BC. Moreover, 63.63% of the patients with FH of BC and without an inherited pathogenic genetic variant detected showed increased BC risk by incorporating the PRS result. Our results indicate a major utility of PRS calculation in women with FH in the absence of a monogenic etiology detected by NGS. By combining high-risk strategies, such as inherited disease analysis, with low-risk screening strategies, such as FH and PRS, breast cancer risk stratification can be improved. This would facilitate the development of more effective preventive measures and optimize the allocation of healthcare resources.
Keyphrases
- newly diagnosed
- risk factors
- end stage renal disease
- breast cancer risk
- copy number
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- genome wide
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- squamous cell carcinoma
- patient reported outcomes
- dna methylation
- type diabetes
- magnetic resonance imaging
- health information
- transcription factor
- oxidative stress
- insulin resistance
- lymph node metastasis