Login / Signup

Truer Facts Through Stronger Values: Confronting Science's Sociopolitical Realities.

Nadja Eisenberg-GuyotJerzy Eisenberg-Guyot
Published in: New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS (2021)
Assaults on science have led scientists to demand "politics-free/values-free" science that safeguards science against error by grounding it in "politically neutral" evidence. Considering racial disparities in lead poisoning, HIV/AIDS, and COVID-19, we show the solution is doomed. Politically charged beliefs are essential for assessing public-health research; thus, the beliefs' truth affects the research's accuracy. However, science's sociopolitical uses systematically distort politically charged beliefs. Since errors assimilate into our scientific corpus and inform new hypotheses, scientists need accurate sociopolitical theories of distorting forces to identify errors. Analyzing Black-Panther opposition to violence research, we argue since racial disparities structure society and science has been distorted to buttress racial inequities, knowledgeable anti-racist scientists exert corrective forces on research. They hold accurate politically charged beliefs about sociopolitical forces shaping science and health, and are committed to eradicating distortions. Thus, rather than quarantining politically charged beliefs, scientists should sharpen their sociopolitical theories and normative commitments.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • hiv aids
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • coronavirus disease
  • high resolution
  • patient safety
  • adverse drug
  • risk assessment
  • human immunodeficiency virus
  • hepatitis c virus
  • hiv infected
  • electronic health record