Comparison of 2 shear wave elastography systems in reproducibility and accuracy using an elasticity phantom.

This study aimed to compare the accuracy and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the measured elasticity between 2 shear wave elastography systems. Three breast radiologists examined 8 targets of 4 different levels of stiffness (size: 11 mm, 4 mm) in an elasticity phantom (Customized 049A Elasticity QA Phantom, CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA) using 2 different shear wave ultrasound elastography systems: SuperSonic Imagine (SSI) (SSI, Aix en Provence, France) and ShearScan (RS-80A, Samsung Medison, Seoul, Korea). Three radiologists performed ultrasound (US) elastography examinations for the phantom lesions using 2 equipment over a 1-week interval. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and the accuracy of the measured elasticity were analyzed and compared between the 2 systems. The accuracy of shape was also analyzed by shape-matching between B-mode and elastography color image. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used in statistical analysis. For measured elasticity, the intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility were excellent in both SSI and ShearScan (0.994 and 0.998). The overall accuracy was excellent in both systems, but the accuracy in small lesions (4 mm target) was lower in SSI than ShearScan (0.780 vs 0.967). The accuracy of shape-matching on the elastography image was 59.0% and 81.4% in the SSI and ShearScan, respectively. In conclusion, the SSI and ShearScan showed excellent intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. The accuracy of the Young's modulus was high in both the SSI and ShearScan, but the SSI showed decreased accuracy in measurement of elasticity in small targets and poor shape-matching between the B-mode image and color-coded elastography image.