Effect of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with N. O. S. E. on recovery and prognosis of patients.
Jun BuNian LiShan HeHeng-Yi DengJing WenHong-Jun YuanChuan-Ming ZhangMan HuXiao Ting WuPublished in: Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy (2020)
A total of 46 patients in each group were enrolled in this study. The general data and surgery-related indicators were comparable between the two groups (all p > .05). There were no significant differences in the time of first flatus, bleeding, obstruction, constipation, and infectious complications between the two groups (all p > .05). The differences in the incidence of postoperative diarrhea, pain degree, and satisfaction on the aesthetics of the abdominal wall showed significant differences (χ2 = 6.133, p = .013; χ2 = 12.116, p = .017; χ2 = 13.463, p = .004). The postoperative follow-up time was 3-53 months. There were no significant differences in the postoperative hospital stay, medical costs, hospital readmission rate, incidence of incisional hernia, overall survival, disease-free survival, and QOL between the two groups (all p > .05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery with NOSE for eligible patients with CRC was a feasible choice.
Keyphrases
- laparoscopic surgery
- end stage renal disease
- free survival
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- patients undergoing
- healthcare
- newly diagnosed
- risk factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- minimally invasive
- patient reported outcomes
- pain management
- electronic health record
- coronary artery disease
- big data
- irritable bowel syndrome
- deep learning
- coronary artery bypass
- adverse drug
- machine learning
- acute care
- data analysis