Health-Related Quality of Life in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery.
Karen D CoulmanJane M BlazebyPublished in: Current obesity reports (2021)
The impact of bariatric surgery on HRQL is less well-understood than its clinical effectiveness on weight and co-morbidities. Poor-quality study design and different HRQL measures challenge systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Available limited evidence suggests that physical aspects of HRQL may improve more than mental health aspects of HRQL after bariatric surgery, reaching maximal benefits 1-2 years post-surgery. Comparative HRQL analyses between bariatric procedures cannot be made due to a lack of randomised data. Qualitative research highlights the tensions patients experience after bariatric surgery, which provides insights to observed changes in HRQL. Standardized HRQL measures are being developed and agreed to improve future evidence synthesis. Two multi-centre randomised trials of bariatric surgical procedures including detailed HRQL assessment are in progress. It is hoped that the combination of comparative high-quality HRQL data and information from qualitative studies will provide new insights into patient well-being and health after bariatric surgery.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- weight loss
- systematic review
- bariatric surgery
- meta analyses
- clinical trial
- minimally invasive
- roux en y gastric bypass
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- open label
- coronary artery bypass
- physical activity
- ejection fraction
- gastric bypass
- electronic health record
- big data
- peritoneal dialysis
- health information
- obese patients
- coronary artery disease
- double blind
- heart rate
- patient reported outcomes
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- resistance training
- quality improvement
- prognostic factors
- body composition
- weight gain
- case control