Login / Signup

Transplant program evaluations in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jonathan M MillerGrace R LydenDavid ZaunBertram L KasiskeRyutaro HiroseAjay K IsraniJon J Snyder
Published in: American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (2022)
Potential regional variations in effects of COVID-19 on federally mandated, program-specific evaluations by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) have been controversial. SRTR January 2022 program evaluations ended transplant follow-up on March 12, 2020, and excluded transplants performed from March 13, 2020 to June 12, 2020 (the "carve-out"). This study examined the carve-out's impact, and the effect of additionally censoring COVID-19 deaths, on first-year posttransplant outcomes for transplants from July 2018 through December 2020. Program-specific hazard ratios (HRs) for graft failure and death estimated under two alternative scenarios were compared with published HRs: (1) the carve-out was removed; (2) the carve-out was retained, but deaths due to COVID-19 were additionally censored. The HRs estimated by censoring COVID-19 deaths were highly correlated with those estimated with the carve-out alone (r 2  = .96). Removal of the carve-out resulted in greater variation in HRs while remaining highly correlated (r 2  = .82); however, little geographic impact of the carve-out was observed. The carve-out increased average HR in the Northwest by 0.049; carve-out plus censoring reduced average HR in the Midwest by 0.009. Other regions of the country were not significantly affected. Thus, the current COVID-19 carve-out does not appear to impart substantial bias based on the region of the country.
Keyphrases
  • coronavirus disease
  • sars cov
  • quality improvement
  • respiratory syndrome coronavirus
  • type diabetes
  • systematic review
  • climate change
  • risk assessment
  • skeletal muscle
  • weight loss
  • human health