Automated Prognosis Marker Assessment in Breast Cancers Using BLEACH&STAIN Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry.
Tim MandelkowElena BadyMagalie C J LuratiJonas B RaedlerJan H MüllerZhihao HuangEik VettorazziMaximilian LennartzTill Sebastian ClauditzPatrick LebokLisa SteinhilperLinn WoelberGuido SauterEnikö BerkesSimon BühlerPeter PaluchowskiUwe HeilenkötterVolkmar MuellerBarbara SchmalfeldtAlbert von der AssenFrank JacobsenTill KrechRainer H KrechRonald SimonChristian BernreutherStefan SteurerEike BurandtNiclas C BlessinPublished in: Biomedicines (2023)
Prognostic markers in routine clinical management of breast cancer are often assessed using RNA-based multi-gene panels that depend on fluctuating tumor purity. Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) holds the potential for an improved risk assessment. To enable automated prognosis marker detection (i.e., progesterone receptor [PR], estrogen receptor [ER], androgen receptor [AR], GATA3, TROP2, HER2, PD-L1, Ki67, TOP2A), a framework for automated breast cancer identification was developed and validated involving thirteen different artificial intelligence analysis steps and an algorithm for cell distance analysis using 11+1-marker-BLEACH&STAIN-mfIHC staining in 1404 invasive breast cancers of no special type (NST). The framework for automated breast cancer detection discriminated normal glands from malignant glands with an accuracy of 98.4%. This approach identified that five (PR, ER, AR, GATA3, PD-L1) of nine biomarkers were associated with prolonged overall survival ( p ≤ 0.0095 each) and two of these (PR, AR) were found to be independent risk factors in multivariate analysis ( p ≤ 0.0151 each). The combined assessment of PR-ER-AR-GATA3-PD-L1 as a five-marker prognosis score showed strong prognostic relevance ( p < 0.0001) and was an independent risk factor in multivariate analysis ( p = 0.0034). Automated breast cancer detection in combination with an artificial intelligence-based analysis of mfIHC enables a rapid and reliable analysis of multiple prognostic parameters. The strict limitation of the analysis to malignant cells excludes the impact of fluctuating tumor purity on assay precision.
Keyphrases
- artificial intelligence
- machine learning
- deep learning
- estrogen receptor
- risk factors
- high throughput
- risk assessment
- big data
- transcription factor
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- squamous cell carcinoma
- label free
- signaling pathway
- breast cancer cells
- climate change
- mesenchymal stem cells
- human health
- oxidative stress
- copy number
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- quantum dots
- nucleic acid