Login / Signup

CINSARC signature outperforms gold-standard TNM staging and consensus molecular subtypes for clinical outcome in stage II-III colorectal carcinoma.

Anne Cecile BrunacJoanna FourquetGaëlle PerotMarion JaffrelotJulie MeillerouxMarie DanjouxThomas FilleronVincent NicolaïRosine GuimbaudSamira IcherNadim FarésJanick SelvesFrederic Chibon
Published in: Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc (2022)
The outcome of stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) is highly variable and therapeutic choice is currently based on TNM staging with a few additional biomarkers. However, studies show that some stage III patients have a better prognosis than some stage II patients. A promising consensus molecular (CMS) classification with prognostic relevance has been developed, but it is not used in daily practice. Our team developed CINSARC, a 67-gene expression prognostic signature, whose prognostic value has been demonstrated in many cancer types. It is applicable to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks using NanoString® technology. We investigated whether it could predict outcome in stage II-III CRC. We established the CINSARC classification on the TCGA retrospective cohort comprising 297 stage II-III CRC patients using RNA sequencing and on a second independent cohort comprising 169 cases using NanoString® technology. We compared its recurrence-free and overall survival prognostic value with TNM staging and CMS classification. In the TCGA cohort, we showed that CINSARC significantly splits the population of stage II-III CRC into two groups with different progression-free interval (P = 1.68 × 10 -2 ; HR = 1.87 [1.11-3.16]) and overall survival (P = 3.73 × 10 -3 ; HR = 2.45 [1.31-4.59]) and is a strong prognostic factor in multivariate analysis, outperforming TNM staging and CMS classification. We validated these results in the second cohort by applying CINSARC on FFPE samples with Nanostring® technology. CINSARC is a ready-to-use tool with a robust independent prognostic value in stage II-III CRC.
Keyphrases