Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock.
Jan-Sören PadbergJannik FeldLeonie PadbergJeanette KöppeLena MakowskiJoachim GerßPatrik DrögeThomas RuhnkeChristian GünsterStefan Andreas LangeHolger ReineckePublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Our data show noticeably more in-hospital complications in patients on tMCS and higher mortality with V-A ECMO and Impella. The use of both devices is an independent risk factor for mortality, whereas the use of IABP is associated with a survival benefit.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- risk factors
- palliative care
- end stage renal disease
- cardiovascular events
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- quality improvement
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- electronic health record
- acute myocardial infarction
- type diabetes
- metabolic syndrome
- affordable care act
- coronary artery disease
- big data
- skeletal muscle
- acute coronary syndrome
- left ventricular
- acute care
- left ventricular assist device
- drug induced