Login / Signup

SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs.

Alvin X HanAmy ToporowskiJilian A SacksMark D PerkinsSylvie BriandMaria van KerkhoveEmma HannaySergio CarmonaBill RodriguezEdyth ParkerBrooke E NicholsColin A Russell
Published in: medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences (2022)
The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify infected people. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (mean = 27 tests/100,000 people/day). We simulated COVID-19 epidemics in a prototypical LMIC to investigate how testing rates, sampling strategies, and sequencing proportions jointly impact surveillance outcomes and showed that low testing rates and spatiotemporal biases delay time-to-detection of new variants by weeks-to-months and can lead to unreliable estimates of variant prevalence even when the proportion of samples sequenced is increased. Accordingly, investments in wider access to diagnostics to support testing rates of ∼100 tests/100,000 people/day could enable more timely detection of new variants and reliable estimates of variant prevalence. The performance of global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance programs is fundamentally limited by access to diagnostic testing.
Keyphrases