Login / Signup

Congenital isolated clubfoot: Correlation between prenatal assessment and postnatal degree of severity.

Mariano M LannaDaniela CasatiClelia TorreSergio MonforteAntonio AndreacchioStefano FaiolaIrene CetinMariaAngela Rustico
Published in: Prenatal diagnosis (2020)
Diagnosis was confirmed in 45/53 neonates (84.9%, FP 15%). Values were higher for both angle and W/L in true vs false positive cases (median angle 100.4° versus 69.55°, p <.000; median W/L 0.53 vs 0.45, p = .001), no difference for T/C (3.77 vs 3.48, p = .8). The area under the curve for angle was 0.98 (CI 0.94-1.00), with a diagnostic cut-off of 84.7° (PPV of 100%, NPV of 66.7%). Median Pirani score, available for 33 neonates (73.3%) was 3 (IQR 3-4): only angle correlated with Pirani score (Spearman coefficient 0.36, p = .04) CONCLUSION: Measuring the angle between the foot and lower leg can reduce the FP rate of prenatal congenital clubfoot diagnosis and better predict the need for postnatal treatment.
Keyphrases
  • high resolution
  • preterm infants
  • pregnant women
  • low birth weight
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • smoking cessation