Differences in the prognostic implication of ground-glass opacity on CT according to pathological nodal status in lung cancers treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy.
Sohee ParkSang Min LeeJooae ChoeSehoon ChoiSehee KimKyung-Hyun DoJoon Beom SeoPublished in: European radiology (2022)
• The presence of ground-glass opacity was associated with a favorable prognosis, only in pathological node-negative patients (5-year disease-free survival, p = .002; 5-year overall survival, p = .002). • Within pathological node-negative patients, the effect of ground-glass opacity on 5-year disease-free survival was valid in patients with cT1 category (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.72; p < .001), but not in patients with cT2 or above category. • Within pathological node-negative patients, the effect of ground-glass opacity on 5-year overall survival was valid in patients with cT1/2 category (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.68; p = .002), but not in patients with cT3/4 category.
Keyphrases
- free survival
- end stage renal disease
- computed tomography
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- image quality
- chronic kidney disease
- lymph node
- contrast enhanced
- prognostic factors
- magnetic resonance imaging
- squamous cell carcinoma
- magnetic resonance
- positron emission tomography
- young adults
- radiation therapy
- rectal cancer
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy