Login / Signup

Bioaerosols are the dominant source of warm-temperature immersion-mode INPs and drive uncertainties in INP predictability.

Gavin C CornwellChristina S McCluskeyThomas C J HillEzra T LevinNicholas E RothfussSheng-Lun TaiMarkus D PettersPaul J DeMottSonia M KreidenweisKimberly Ann PratherSusannah M Burrows
Published in: Science advances (2023)
Ice-nucleating particles (INPs) are rare atmospheric aerosols that initiate primary ice formation, but accurately simulating their concentrations and variability in large-scale climate models remains a challenge. Doing so requires both simulating major particle sources and parameterizing their ice nucleation (IN) efficiency. Validating and improving model predictions of INP concentrations requires measuring their concentrations delineated by particle type. We present a method to speciate INP concentrations into contributions from dust, sea spray aerosol (SSA), and bioaerosol. Field campaign data from Bodega Bay, California, showed that bioaerosols were the primary source of INPs between -12° and -20°C, while dust was a minor source and SSA had little impact. We found that recent parameterizations for dust and SSA accurately predicted ambient INP concentrations. However, the model did not skillfully simulate bioaerosol INPs, suggesting a need for further research to identify major factors controlling their emissions and INP efficiency for improved representation in models.
Keyphrases
  • health risk
  • health risk assessment
  • human health
  • air pollution
  • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
  • drinking water
  • climate change
  • electronic health record
  • risk assessment
  • artificial intelligence
  • carbon dioxide