Dialysate calcium, alfacalcidol, and clinical outcomes: A post-hoc analysis of the J-DAVID trial.
Kunitoshi IsekiDaijiro KabataTetsuo ShojiMasaaki InabaMasanori EmotoKatsuhito MoriTomoaki MoriokaShinya NakataniAyumi ShintaniPublished in: PloS one (2022)
The selection of dialysate calcium concentration (D-Ca) is still controversial among chronic hemodialysis (HD) regimens. We examined the trajectories of CKD MBD parameters among the J-DAVID trial participants to see the effect of D-Ca and alfacalcidol. The trial was an open-label randomized clinical trial including 976 HD patients with intact PTH of 180 pg/mL or lower which compared the users of vitamin D receptor activator (oral alfacalcidol) and non-users over a median of 4 years. The main D-Ca used at baseline were 3.0 mEq/L in 70% and 2.5 mEq/L in 25%, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events and the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses in which D-Ca was included as a possible effect modifier and serum laboratory data as time-varying covariates showed no significant effect modification for composite cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. This post hoc analysis showed that the effects of alfacalcidol on cardiovascular outcomes were not significantly modified by D-Ca.
Keyphrases
- cardiovascular events
- coronary artery disease
- cardiovascular disease
- study protocol
- phase iii
- peritoneal dialysis
- clinical trial
- protein kinase
- chronic kidney disease
- end stage renal disease
- depressive symptoms
- electronic health record
- inflammatory response
- open label
- big data
- nuclear factor
- machine learning
- data analysis
- drug induced