Efficacy of Surgical/Wound Washes against Bacteria: Effect of Different In Vitro Models.
Farhana ParvinKaren VickeryAnand K DevaHonghua HuPublished in: Materials (Basel, Switzerland) (2022)
Topical antiseptics are often used to treat chronic wounds with biofilm infections and during salvage of biofilm contaminated implants, but their antibacterial efficacy is frequently only tested against non-aggregated planktonic or free-swimming organisms. This study evaluated the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of four commercial surgical washes Bactisure, TorrenTX, minimally invasive lavage (MIS), and Betadine against six bacterial species: Staphylococcus epidermidis , Staphylococcus aureus , Streptococcus pyogenes , Acinetobacter baumannii , Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli, which are commonly isolated from surgical site infections and chronic wound infections using different in vitro models. We determined minimum planktonic inhibitory and eradication concentration and minimum 1-day-old biofilm inhibition and eradication concentration of antiseptics in 96-well plates format with 24 h contact time. We also tested the efficacy of antiseptics at in-use concentration and contact time in the presence of biological soil against 3-day-old biofilm grown on coupons with shear in a bioreactor, such that the results are more applicable to the clinical biofilm situations. In the 96-well plate model, the minimum concentration required to inhibit or kill planktonic and biofilm bacteria was lower for Bactisure and TorrenTX than for MIS and Betadine. However, Betadine and Bactisure showed better antibiofilm efficacy than TorrenTX and MIS in the 3-day-old biofilm bioreactor model at in-use concentration. The minimal concentration of surgical washes required to inhibit or kill planktonic bacterial cells and biofilms varies, suggesting the need for the development and use of biofilm-based assays to assess antimicrobial therapies, such as topical antiseptics and their effective concentrations. The antibiofilm efficacy of surgical washes against different bacterial species also varies, highlighting the importance of testing against various bacterial species to achieve a thorough understanding of their efficacy.
Keyphrases
- pseudomonas aeruginosa
- staphylococcus aureus
- biofilm formation
- candida albicans
- acinetobacter baumannii
- escherichia coli
- cystic fibrosis
- minimally invasive
- wound healing
- drug resistant
- drug induced
- signaling pathway
- heavy metals
- high throughput
- silver nanoparticles
- single cell
- cell proliferation
- risk assessment
- anti inflammatory
- robot assisted