Safety of Inhomogeneous Dose Distribution IMRT for High-Grade Glioma Reirradiation: A Prospective Phase I/II Trial (GLIORAD TRIAL).
Patrizia CiammellaSalvatore CozziAndrea BottiLucia GiaccheriniRoberto SghedoniMatteo OrlandiManuela NapoliRosario PascarellaAnna PisanelloMarco RussoFrancesco CavallieriMaria Paola RuggieriSilvio CavutoLuisa SavoldiCinzia IottiMauro IoriPublished in: Cancers (2022)
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive astrocytic primary brain tumor, and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) followed by maintenance of adjuvant TMZ is the current standard of care. Despite advances in imaging techniques and multi-modal treatment options, the median overall survival (OS) remains poor. As an alternative to surgery, re-irradiation (re-RT) can be a therapeutic option in recurrent GBM. Re-irradiation for brain tumors is increasingly used today, and several studies have demonstrated its feasibility. Besides differing techniques, the published data include a wide range of doses, emphasizing that no standard approach exists. The current study aimed to investigate the safety of moderate-high-voxel-based dose escalation in recurrent GBM. From 2016 to 2019, 12 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. Retreatment consisted of re-irradiation with a total dose of 30 Gy (up to 50 Gy) over 5 days using the IMRT (arc VMAT) technique. A dose painting by numbers (DPBN)/dose escalation plan were performed, and a continuous relation between the voxel intensity of the functional image set and the risk of recurrence in that voxel were used to define target and dose distribution. Re-irradiation was well tolerated in all treated patients. No toxicities greater than G3 were recorded; only one patient had severe G3 acute toxicity, characterized by muscle weakness and fatigue. Median overall survival (OS2) and progression-free survival (PFS2) from the time of re-irradiation were 10.4 months and 5.7 months, respectively; 3-, 6-, and 12-month OS2 were 92%, 75%, and 42%, respectively; and 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS2 were 83%, 42%, and 8%, respectively. Our work demonstrated a tolerable tolerance profile of this approach, and the future prospective phase II study will analyze the efficacy in terms of PFS and OS.
Keyphrases
- free survival
- newly diagnosed
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- phase ii study
- open label
- high grade
- healthcare
- locally advanced
- chronic kidney disease
- radiation induced
- prognostic factors
- study protocol
- high intensity
- phase iii
- systematic review
- radiation therapy
- oxidative stress
- skeletal muscle
- phase ii
- palliative care
- case report
- photodynamic therapy
- liver failure
- patient reported outcomes
- acute coronary syndrome
- atrial fibrillation
- big data
- electronic health record
- patient reported
- current status
- health insurance
- sleep quality