Making a decision about surgery for female urinary incontinence: a qualitative study of women's views.
Rebecca LynchPhilip Toozs-HobsonJonathan DuckettDouglas TincelloSimon CohnPublished in: International urogynecology journal (2020)
Acknowledging women's personal accounts of UI shifts the concept of 'severity' beyond a medical definition to include what is important to patients themselves. Decision-making around elective surgery must endeavour to link medical information with women's own experiences and personal criteria, which often change in priority over time. We propose that this research provides insight into how the controversy around the use of mesh in the UK emerged. This study also suggests ways in which facilitating shared decision-making should be conducted in future.
Keyphrases
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- decision making
- minimally invasive
- urinary incontinence
- pregnancy outcomes
- coronary artery bypass
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- peritoneal dialysis
- insulin resistance
- metabolic syndrome
- pregnant women
- health information
- surgical site infection
- social media
- skeletal muscle
- current status
- type diabetes
- patient reported outcomes
- patient reported