Effect of ceramic materials and tooth preparation design on computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing endocrown adaptation and retentive strength: An in vitro study.
Ahmed FarghalKarim DewedarMohammed H AbdElazizSamah SakerMahy HassonaRadhwan Saleh AlgabriAhmed Yaseen AlqutaibiPublished in: Clinical and experimental dental research (2024)
IPS emax ceramic adapted better than monolithic zirconia ceramic, regardless of the preparation design. Ferrule preparation design is more retentive than butt joint preparation, regardless of the type of ceramic material used.