Login / Signup

The Use of Incremental, Decremental or a Random Order of Loads does not Affect Peak velocity Values during Bench Press Throw Load-Velocity Relationships.

Rafael SabidoPablo AsencioAdrian Garcia-ValverdeFernando Garcia-AguilarRodrigo Moreno-LilaJose Luis Hernández Davó
Published in: International journal of sports medicine (2023)
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the load order used (i. e. incremental, decremental or random loads order) during the bench press throw load-velocity profile on peak velocity achieved against four different loads (20-40-60-80% of one repetition maximum [1RM]). Both intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated to assess the reliability of the measures. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess differences between protocols. A linear regression analysis was performed to assess the load-velocity relationships among the different protocols. Peak velocity showed good to high ICC values independently of the load used (ICC=0.83-0.92). CV scores showed good reliability (ranging between 2.2 and 6.2%). No significant differences in peak velocity attained at each load were found between the three testing protocols ( p> 0.05). In addition, peak velocity at each load was very large to almost perfect, correlated between protocols ( r= 0.790-0.920). The linear regression model showed a significant relationship between testing protocols ( p< 0.001; R 2 =0.94). In conclusion, due to some ICC scores below 0.9 and R 2 below 0.95, the indistinct use of different load-order protocols to assess load-velocity relationships in the bench press throw exercise is not recommended.
Keyphrases
  • blood flow
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • magnetic resonance
  • high intensity
  • body composition
  • neural network
  • diffusion weighted imaging