Login / Signup

Cost-Effectiveness of p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology Reflex Following Co-Testing with hrHPV Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Diane M HarperRye J AndersonEd BakerTiffany M Yu
Published in: Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) (2023)
The first biomarker-based cervical cancer screening test, p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology (DS), has been clinically validated and approved in the United States for triage of women being screened for cervical cancer who test positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). The primary aim of this work is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DS triage after co-testing findings of positive non-16/18 HPV types and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) cytology. A payer-perspective Markov microsimulation model was developed to assess the impact of DS reflex testing. Each comparison simulated 12,250 screening-eligible women through health states defined by hrHPV status and genotype, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 1-3, invasive cervical cancer (ICC) by stage, and cancer-related or non-cancer death. Screening test performance data were from the IMPACT clinical validation trial. Transition probabilities were from population and natural history studies. Costs of baseline medical care, screening visits, tests, procedures, and ICC were included. DS reflex after co-testing was cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained of $15,231 (95% CI $10,717-$25,400) compared to co-testing with hrHPV pooled primary and genotyped reflex testing, and $23,487 (95% CI $15,745-$46,175) compared to co-testing with hrHPV genotyping with no reflex test. Screening and medical costs and life-years increased, while ICC costs and risk of ICC death decreased. Incorporating DS reflex into co-testing cervical cancer screening algorithms is projected to be cost-effective.
Keyphrases