Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned monarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes.
Priya RastogiJoyce O'ShaughnessyMiguel MartinFrances M BoyleJavier CortesHope S RugoMatthew P GoetzErika Paige HamiltonChiun-Sheng HuangElzbieta SenkusAlexey A TryakinIrfan CicinLaura TestaPatrick NevenJens HuoberZhi-Ming ShaoRan WeiValérie AndréMaria MunozBelen San AntonioAshwin ShahirNadia HarbeckStephen R D JohnstonPublished in: Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2024)
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) that persisted beyond the 2-year treatment period in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Here, we report 5-year efficacy results from a prespecified overall survival (OS) interim analysis. In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 54 months, the benefit of abemaciclib was sustained with hazard ratios of 0.680 (95% CI, 0.599 to 0.772) for IDFS and 0.675 (95% CI, 0.588 to 0.774) for DRFS. This persistence of abemaciclib benefit translated to continuous separation of the curves with a deepening in 5-year absolute improvement in IDFS and DRFS rates of 7.6% and 6.7%, respectively, compared with rates of 6% and 5.3% at 4 years and 4.8% and 4.1% at 3 years. With fewer deaths in the abemaciclib plus ET arm compared with the ET-alone arm (208 v 234), statistical significance was not reached for OS. No new safety signals were observed. In conclusion, abemaciclib plus ET continued to reduce the risk of developing invasive and distant disease recurrence beyond the completion of treatment. The increasing absolute improvement at 5 years is consistent with a carryover effect and further supports the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk EBC.
Keyphrases
- free survival
- epidermal growth factor receptor
- clinical trial
- early breast cancer
- tyrosine kinase
- advanced non small cell lung cancer
- endothelial cells
- lymph node
- early stage
- stem cells
- phase ii
- bone marrow
- open label
- liquid chromatography
- phase iii
- double blind
- insulin resistance
- smoking cessation
- replacement therapy
- case control