Review of the use of simulators in learning revascularization techniques.

Prior literature evaluating the utility of SBT has demonstrated remarkable results including reduced procedural times, use of fluoroscopy, incidence of mistakes, improved stent placement, and confidence with PCI simulators. Similarly, the use of CABG and OPCAB simulators demonstrated improvement in forceps use, needle angles, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill, and reduced completion times. The apprentice model has undoubtedly been successful as the most successful cardiac surgeons and cardiologists have been produced through this training model. Even so, many shortcomings have been identified including insufficient time to teach all relevant technical skills, inadequate exposure to rare adverse events, high-cost, and often unstructured format while being time-consuming and resource-intensive with little objective assessment of proficiency. SBT has been pursued as a potential adjunct to fill the gaps left by the traditional apprentice model. While simulations have been demonstrated to be successful in teaching both experienced and inexperienced learners complex techniques, it is unlikely that training will ever solely rely on simulations. The most efficient method of training learners for revascularization in the future will likely involve a combination of hands-on learning and SBT.