Login / Signup

Evaluating the impact of first-yes-counts instructions on eyewitness performance using the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model.

Kristina WinterNicola Marie MenneRaoul BellAxel Buchner
Published in: Scientific reports (2023)
In eyewitness research, multiple identification decisions in sequential lineups are typically prevented by telling participants that only their first identification decision counts. These first-yes-counts instructions are incompatible with standard police protocols prescribing that witnesses shall see the entire lineup. Horry et al. were the first to experimentally test how this discrepancy between eyewitness research and standard police protocols affects eyewitness identification decisions. Here, the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model was used to disentangle the effect of the first-yes-counts instructions on the detection and guessing processes underlying eyewitness identification decisions. We report both a reanalysis of Horry et al.'s data and a conceptual replication. Both the reanalysis and the results of the conceptual replication confirm that first-yes-counts instructions do not affect the detection of the culprit but decrease the probability of guessing-based selections. To improve the ecological validity, research on sequential lineups should avoid first-yes-counts instructions.
Keyphrases
  • bioinformatics analysis
  • primary care
  • risk assessment
  • human health
  • decision making
  • sensitive detection