Login / Signup

Network Meta-Analysis for Single-Case Design Studies: An Illustration.

Ana Barbosa MendesLaleh JamshidiWim Van den NoortgateBelén Fernández-Castilla
Published in: Evaluation & the health professions (2022)
Single-case designs (SCDs) are used to evaluate the effects of interventions on individual participants. By repeatedly measuring participants under different conditions, SCD studies focus on individual effects rather than on group summaries. The main limitation of SCDs remains its generalisability to wider populations, reducing the relevance of their findings for practice and policy making. With this limitation in mind, methodological developments for synthesising SCD data from different studies that investigate the same research question have intensified in the past decades (e.g. multilevel modelling). However, these techniques are restricted to comparing two interventions at a time and can only incorporate evidence from studies that directly compare the two treatments of interest. These limitations could be addressed by using network meta-analysis that incorporates both direct and indirect evidence to simultaneously compare multiple interventions. Despite its potential, network meta-analytical techniques have yet to be applied to SCD data. Thus, in this paper, we argue that network meta-analysis can be a valuable tool to synthesise SCD data. We demonstrate the use of network meta-analysis in SCD data using a real dataset, and we conclude by reflecting on the challenges that SCD researchers might face when applying network meta-analysis methods to their data.
Keyphrases
  • systematic review
  • case control
  • meta analyses
  • electronic health record
  • healthcare
  • big data
  • physical activity
  • public health
  • mass spectrometry
  • network analysis
  • artificial intelligence
  • deep learning
  • genetic diversity