Timing and Reporting of Secondary Overall Survival End Points for Phase III Trials in Advanced/Metastatic Disease.
Boris FreidlinLarissa A KordeEdward L KornPublished in: Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (2023)
Recent therapeutic advances have led to improved patient survival in many cancer settings. Although prolongation of survival remains the ultimate goal of cancer treatment, the availability of effective salvage therapies could make definitive phase III trials with primary overall survival (OS) end points difficult to complete in a timely manner. Therefore, to accelerate development of new therapies, many phase III trials of new cancer therapies are now designed with intermediate primary end points (eg, progression-free survival in the metastatic setting) with OS designated as a secondary end point. We review recently published phase III trials and assess contemporary practices for designing and reporting OS as a secondary end point. We then provide design and reporting recommendations for trials with OS as a secondary end point to safeguard OS data integrity and optimize access to the OS data for patient, clinician, and public-health stakeholders.
Keyphrases
- phase iii
- free survival
- open label
- clinical trial
- double blind
- public health
- phase ii
- placebo controlled
- squamous cell carcinoma
- papillary thyroid
- small cell lung cancer
- healthcare
- case report
- adverse drug
- squamous cell
- primary care
- electronic health record
- big data
- systematic review
- study protocol
- deep learning
- radiation therapy
- young adults
- rectal cancer
- artificial intelligence