Different definitions of atopic dermatitis: impact on prevalence estimates and associated risk factors.
Toshinori NakamuraS HaiderS ColicinoClare S MurrayJohn W HollowayAngela SimpsonP CullinanAdnan Custovicnull nullPublished in: The British journal of dermatology (2019)
Use of different definitions of AD results in substantial differences in prevalence estimates, the performance of prediction models and association with risk factors. What's already known about this topic? There is no objective test that can unequivocally confirm the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) and no uniform clinical definition. This results in different definitions utilized in AD studies, raising concerns on the generalizability of the results and comparability across different studies. What does this study add? This study has shown that different definitions of 'cases' and 'controls' have major impacts upon prevalence estimates and associations with risk factors, including genetics, in two population-based birth cohorts. These findings suggest the importance of developing a consensus on AD definitions of both 'controls' and 'cases' to minimize biases in studies.