Outcomes of Interfacility VV-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Transfers: A Multicenter Study.
Conner OlsonJillian WotheJacob BraatenDanika EvansKarl DamrothJohn BohmanTroy SeelhammerRamiro Saavedra-RomeroMatthew PrekkerMelissa E BrunsvoldPublished in: ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) (2024)
As the availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) expands, so has the need for interfacility transfer to ECMO centers. However, the impact of these transfers is unknown. We hypothesized that interfacility transfers would be associated with increased complications and mortality. This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients treated with venovenous (VV) ECMO at all four adult ECMO centers comprising our statewide registry. Complications, mortality, ECMO duration, length of stay, and disposition were compared based on cannulation at an ECMO center versus outside hospital and transferred by air versus ground after adjusting for baseline covariates/parameters. The study included 420 adult patients, 36% of whom were cannulated at an outside institution before transfer. Of these, 63% were transported by ground and the remainder by air. Risk adjusted logistic regression revealed similar odds of mortality between those cannulated at ECMO centers versus referring hospital and then transported (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-1.22). This study supports the practice of interfacility ECMO transfer.