Login / Signup

Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: The Role of Texture Analysis.

Paul-Andrei ȘtefanRoxana-Adelina LupeanCarmen Mihaela MihuAndrei LeboviciMihaela Daniela OanceaLiviu HîțuDaniel DumaCsaba Csutak
Published in: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2021)
The classic ultrasonographic differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses encounters several limitations. Ultrasonography-based texture analysis (USTA) offers a new perspective, but its role has been incompletely evaluated. This study aimed to further investigate USTA's capacity in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal tumors, as well as comparing the workflow and the results with previously-published research. A total of 123 adnexal lesions (benign, 88; malignant, 35) were retrospectively included. The USTA was performed on dedicated software. By applying three reduction techniques, 23 features with the highest discriminatory potential were selected. The features' ability to identify ovarian malignancies was evaluated through univariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristics analyses, and also by the use of the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier. Three parameters were independent predictors for ovarian neoplasms (sum variance, and two variations of the sum of squares). Benign and malignant lesions were differentiated with 90.48% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity by the prediction model (which included the three independent predictors), and with 71.43-80% sensitivity and 87.5-89.77% specificity by the KNN classifier. The USTA shows statistically significant differences between the textures of the two groups, but it is unclear whether the parameters can reflect the true histopathological characteristics of adnexal lesions.
Keyphrases
  • contrast enhanced
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • systematic review
  • data analysis
  • risk assessment
  • climate change
  • structural basis