Login / Signup

Different MAF translocations confer similar prognosis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Sarah Goldman-MazurArtur JurczyszynJorge J CastilloAnna Waszczuk-GajdaNorbert GrząśkoJakub RadochaMax BittrichKlaus Martin KortümAlessandro GozzettiLidia Usnarska-ZubkiewiczJulio D VallsDavid S JayabalanRuben NiesvizkyJulia KelmanDaniel CoriuLaura RosinolŁukasz SzukalskiVeronica González-CalleMaria-Victoria Mateos-MantecaKrzysztof JamroziakIwona HusIrit AviviYael C CohenPiotr K MazurAnna SuskaAimee ChappellDeepu MadduriSaurabh ChhabraAriel KlemanParameswaran HariMichel DelforgePaweł RobakMassimo GentileIzabela KozłowskaStuart L GoldbergJacek CzepielMonika Długosz-DaneckaRebecca SilbermannAdam J OlszewskiPeter BarthGabor MikalaChor-Sang ChimDavid H Vesole
Published in: Leukemia & lymphoma (2020)
The MAF translocations, t(14;16) and t(14;20), are considered as adverse prognostic factors based on few studies with small sample sizes. We report on their prognostic impact in a large group of 254 patients - 223 (87.8%) with t(14;16) and 31 (12.2%) with t(14;20). There were no intergroup differences in survival estimates. Median progression-free survival was 16.6 months for t(14;16) and 24.9 months for t(14;20) (p = 0.28). Median overall survival (OS) was 54.0 months and 49.0 months, respectively (p = 0.62). Median OS in patients who underwent double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was 107.0 months versus 60.0 months in patients who received single ASCT (p < 0.001). ISS 3 was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.24-3.19; p = 0.005) in Cox analysis. Our study suggests that t(14;20) should be considered as an adverse factor of equal prognostic implication to t(14;16).
Keyphrases
  • prognostic factors
  • newly diagnosed
  • free survival
  • stem cell transplantation
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • low dose
  • cell therapy
  • mesenchymal stem cells