Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on Facebook.
Sandra Gonzalez-BailonDavid M J LazerPablo BarberÁMeiqing ZhangHunt AllcottTaylor BrownAdriana Crespo-TenorioDeen FreelonMatthew GentzkowAndrew M GuessShanto IyengarYoung Mie KimNeil MalhotraDevra MoehlerBrendan NyhanJennifer PanCarlos Velasco RiveraJaime SettleEmily ThorsonRebekah TrombleArjun WilkinsMagdalena WojcieszakChad Kiewiet de JongeAnnie FrancoWinter MasonNatalie Jomini StroudJoshua A TuckerPublished in: Science (New York, N.Y.) (2023)
Does Facebook enable ideological segregation in political news consumption? We analyzed exposure to news during the US 2020 election using aggregated data for 208 million US Facebook users. We compared the inventory of all political news that users could have seen in their feeds with the information that they saw (after algorithmic curation) and the information with which they engaged. We show that (i) ideological segregation is high and increases as we shift from potential exposure to actual exposure to engagement; (ii) there is an asymmetry between conservative and liberal audiences, with a substantial corner of the news ecosystem consumed exclusively by conservatives; and (iii) most misinformation, as identified by Meta's Third-Party Fact-Checking Program, exists within this homogeneously conservative corner, which has no equivalent on the liberal side. Sources favored by conservative audiences were more prevalent on Facebook's news ecosystem than those favored by liberals.