Influence of familial forms of inflammatory bowel disease on the use of immunosuppressants, biological agents, and surgery in the era of biological therapies. Results from the ENEIDA project.
Carlos González MuñozaMargalida CalafatJavier P GisbertEva IglesiasMiguel MínguezBeatriz SiciliaMontserrat AceitunoFernando GomollónXavier CalvetElena RicartLuisa De CastroMontserrat RiveroFrancisco MesoneroLucía MárquezPilar NosAinhoa Rodríguez-PescadorJordi GuardiolaMarianaFe García-SepulcreSantiago García-LópezRufo H Lorente-PoyatosCristina AlbaRamon Sánchez-OcañaIsabel VeraLucía MaderoSabino RiestraMercedes Navarro-LlavatJose L Pérez-CalleBlau CampsManuel Van DomselaarAlfredo J LucendoMaria Dolores Martín-ArranzMiguel A Montoro-HuguetMónica Sierra-AusínJordina LlaóDaniel CarpioPilar VarelaOlga MerinoLuis I Fernández-SalazarMarta PiquerasEva SeséDavid BusquetsCarlos TardilloNuria MarotoJoan RieraCarlos Martínez-FloresFernando MuñozJordi Gordillo-ÁbalosFederico BertolettiEsther Garcia-PlanellaEugeni Domènechnull nullPublished in: Postgraduate medical journal (2024)
In the era of biological therapies, familial and sporadic forms of IBD show similar phenotypes and are managed medically in a similar way; whether these is due to lack of phenotypical differences or an effect of biological therapies is uncertain. What is already known on this topic: IBD's etiopathogenesis points to an interaction between environmental and genetic factors, being familial history a controversial prognostic factor. Biological agents use and need for surgery regarding familial or sporadic forms of IBDs present conflicting results. What this study adds: Familial and sporadic forms of IBD have similar phenotypes and are managed medically and surgically in a similar way. How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Familial aggregation should not be considered a factor associated with more aggressive disease.