Cell death and barrier disruption by clinically used iodine concentrations.
Anne SteinsChristina S E CarrollFui Jiun ChoongAmee J GeorgeJin-Shu HeKate M ParsonsShouya FengSi Ming ManCathelijne KamLex M van LoonPerlita PohRita FerreiraGraham J MannRussell L GruenKatherine M HannanRoss D HannanKlaus-Martin SchultePublished in: Life science alliance (2023)
Povidone-iodine (PVP-I) inactivates a broad range of pathogens. Despite its widespread use over decades, the safety of PVP-I remains controversial. Its extended use in the current SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic urges the need to clarify safety features of PVP-I on a cellular level. Our investigation in epithelial, mesothelial, endothelial, and innate immune cells revealed that the toxicity of PVP-I is caused by diatomic iodine (I 2 ), which is rapidly released from PVP-I to fuel organic halogenation with fast first-order kinetics. Eukaryotic toxicity manifests at below clinically used concentrations with a threshold of 0.1% PVP-I (wt/vol), equalling 1 mM of total available I 2 Above this threshold, membrane disruption, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and abolition of oxidative phosphorylation induce a rapid form of cell death we propose to term iodoptosis. Furthermore, PVP-I attacks lipid rafts, leading to the failure of tight junctions and thereby compromising the barrier functions of surface-lining cells. Thus, the therapeutic window of PVP-I is considerably narrower than commonly believed. Our findings urge the reappraisal of PVP-I in clinical practice to avert unwarranted toxicity whilst safeguarding its benefits.
Keyphrases
- cell death
- sars cov
- oxidative stress
- cell cycle arrest
- clinical practice
- immune response
- induced apoptosis
- risk assessment
- preterm infants
- computed tomography
- signaling pathway
- single molecule
- climate change
- dual energy
- gram negative
- single cell
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- oxide nanoparticles
- antimicrobial resistance