Login / Signup

Selection biases in observational studies affect associations between 'moderate' alcohol consumption and mortality.

Timothy S NaimiTimothy StockwellJinhui ZhaoZiming XuanFrida DangardtRichard SaitzWenbin LiangTanya Chikritzhs
Published in: Addiction (Abingdon, England) (2016)
Selection biases may lead to systematic overestimate of protective effects from 'moderate' alcohol consumption. Overall, most sources of selection bias favor low-volume drinkers in relation to non-drinkers. Studies that attempt to address these types of bias generally find attenuated or non-significant relationships between low-volume alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease, which is the major source of possible protective effects on mortality from low-volume consumption. Furthermore, observed mortality effects among established low-volume consumers are of limited relevance to health-related decisions about whether to initiate consumption or to continue drinking purposefully into old age. Short of randomized trials with mortality end-points, there are a number of approaches that can minimize selection bias involving low-volume alcohol consumption.
Keyphrases
  • alcohol consumption
  • cardiovascular disease
  • cardiovascular events
  • risk factors
  • coronary artery disease
  • high intensity