Surgical vs. transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients over 75 years with aortic stenosis: sociodemographic profile, clinical characteristics, quality of life and functionality.
Víctor Fradejas-SastrePaula Parás-BravoManuel Herrero-MontesMaría Paz-ZuluetaEster Boixadera-PlanasLuis Manuel Fernández-CachoGabriela Veiga-FernándezMaria Elena Arnáiz-GarcíaJose María De-la-Torre-HernándezPublished in: PeerJ (2023)
The individualized choice of TAVR or SAVR in patients with AVS improves patients' quality of life and function. Moreover, the TAVR procedure in patients with a worse baseline situation and a high surgical risk achieved a similar increase in quality of life and functionality compared to patients undergoing SAVR with a better baseline situation.
Keyphrases
- aortic stenosis
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- ejection fraction
- aortic valve
- end stage renal disease
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- patients undergoing
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- coronary artery disease
- minimally invasive
- heart failure
- patient reported
- decision making