Login / Signup

Full composition-wide association study identifies the chemical markers to distinguish different processed camellia oils: Integrating multi-targets with chemometrics.

Ruihong DongTuo LengYuting WangBei GanQiang YuJianhua XieQianwen DuMengting ZhuYi Chen
Published in: Food chemistry (2024)
To identify chemical-markers from hot-pressed, cold-pressed, organic-solvent, aqueous-enzymatic and water extracted camellia oils (HPO, CPO, OSO, AEO, WEO). We report a full composition-wide association study based on GC-MS, LC-MS and 1 HNMR. Squalene, β-amyrin and lupeol were potential-markers in distinguishing different oils through GC-MS. Naringenin, FA 18:1 + 10, undecanedioic acid and tridecanedioic acid exhibited were up-regulated in HPO. 16-Hydroxyhexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid and 9-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid were potential-metabolites in CPO. Characteristic-markers in WEO were hydroquinidine and undecanedioic acid. Gallic acid, hydroquinidine, lichesterylic acid and 7,4'-dihydroxyflavone were biomarkers in AEO. Oleic acid, linoleic acid and triacylglycerols may be potential key markers to distinguish AEO from others via 1 HNMR. Finally, Naringenin, gallic acid, kaempferol, 7,4'-dihydroxyflavone, (Z)-5,8,11-trihydroxyoctadec-9-enoic acid and β-amyrin were screened and validate through integration of nonglyceride minor components and trace metabolites. Results provided understanding of chemical diversity for different processed-camellia oils, and proposed a complementary strategy to distinguish different camellia oils for multidimensional perspective.
Keyphrases
  • gene expression
  • risk assessment
  • dna methylation
  • nitric oxide
  • ms ms
  • genome wide
  • human health
  • heavy metals
  • water soluble