Balancing the benefits and harms of MRI-directed biopsy pathways.
Anwar R PadhaniMasoom A HaiderOlivier RouvierePublished in: European radiology (2022)
• Before a prostate biopsy, the likely benefits and the harms emanating from true and false test MRI results need to be balanced. Prioritizing patients' preferences and their tolerance to potential harms are essential to assess.• The decision curve analysis method is an analytical framework where the net clinical benefit is plotted against a range of risk thresholds of having important cancers, helping patients and their physicians to decide between cancer averse (important cancers being detected) and biopsy averse (biopsies avoided) strategies.• The decision curve analysis method showed that the incorporation of clinical risk factors with MRI findings optimizes biopsy outcomes over a range of clinically relevant risk thresholds, compared to other biopsy strategies.
Keyphrases
- ultrasound guided
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- fine needle aspiration
- risk factors
- magnetic resonance imaging
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- prostate cancer
- prognostic factors
- contrast enhanced
- primary care
- computed tomography
- peritoneal dialysis
- patient reported outcomes
- squamous cell carcinoma
- young adults
- magnetic resonance
- papillary thyroid
- mass spectrometry
- insulin resistance