New Insight into Laboratory Tests and Imaging Modalities for Fast and Accurate Diagnosis of COVID-19: Alternative Suggestions for Routine RT-PCR and CT-A Literature Review.
Amir KhorasaniAmir CheginiArezoo MirzaeiPublished in: Canadian respiratory journal (2020)
The globally inimitable and unremitting outbreak of COVID-19 infection confirmed the emergency need for critical detection of human coronavirus infections. Laboratory diagnostic tests and imaging modalities are two test groups used for the detection of COVID-19. Nowadays, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and computed tomography (CT) have been frequently utilized in the clinic. Some limitations that confront with these tests are false-negative results, tests redone for follow-up procedure, high cost, and unable to do for all patients. To overcome these limitations, modified and alternative tests must be considered. Among these tests, RdRp/Hel RT-PCR assay had the lowest diagnostic limitation and highest sensitivity and specificity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in both respiratory tract and nonrespiratory tract clinical specimens. On the other hand, lung ultrasound (LUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are CT-alternative imaging modalities for the management, screening, and follow-up of COVID-19 patients.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- computed tomography
- magnetic resonance imaging
- contrast enhanced
- real time pcr
- high resolution
- dual energy
- image quality
- positron emission tomography
- coronavirus disease
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- respiratory tract
- end stage renal disease
- emergency department
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- public health
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- healthcare
- magnetic resonance
- peritoneal dialysis
- primary care
- prognostic factors
- case report
- ejection fraction
- quantum dots
- diffusion weighted imaging
- fluorescence imaging
- single cell