The Gastropack Access System as a Model to Access Gastroenterology Services for Gastroscopy Appropriateness in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms: A Comparison with the Open Access System.
Liza CeroniFrancesca LodatoPaolo TubertiniGiovanni MarascoAlessia GazzolaMaurizio BiselliCristiano FabbriFederica BuonfiglioliFrancesco FerraraRamona SchiumeriniAndrea FabbriAlessandra TassoniCarlo DescovichSandra MondiniCesare TosettiValerio VedutiMario De NegriAlessandro FiniStefano GuicciardiMassimo RomanelliGiuseppe Giovanni NavarraGiovanni BarbaraVincenzo Cennamonull On Behalf Of Gastropack System Study GroupPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2023)
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) appropriateness in Open-Access System (OAS) is a relevant issue. The Gastropack Access System (GAS) is a new system to access gastroenterological services, based on the partnership between Gastroenterologists and GPs. This study aims to evaluate if GAS is superior to OAS in terms of EGDS appropriateness. Secondarily, we evaluated the diagnostic yield of EGDS according to ASGE guidelines. The GAS was developed in an area of Bologna where General Practitioners (GPs) could decide to directly prescribe EGDS through OAS or referring to GAS, where EGDS can be scheduled after contact between GPs and specialists sharing a patient's clinical information. Between 2016 and 2019, 2179 cases (M:F = 861:1318, median age 61, IQR 47.72) were referred to GAS and 1467 patients (65%) had a prescription for EGDS; conversely, 874 EGDS were prescribed through OAS (M:F = 383:491; median age 58 yrs, IQR 45.68). Indication was appropriate in 92% in GAS (1312/1424) versus 71% in OAS (618/874), p < 0.001. The rate of clinically significant endoscopic findings (CSEF) was significantly higher in GAS (49% vs. 34.8%, p < 0.001). Adherence to ASGE guidelines was not related to CSEF; however, surveillance for pre-malignant conditions was independently related to CSEF. All neoplasm were observed in appropriate EGD. GAS is an innovative method showing extremely high rates of appropriateness. ASGE guidelines confirmed their validity for cancer detection, but their performance for the detection of other conditions needs to be refined.
Keyphrases
- room temperature
- carbon dioxide
- clinical practice
- primary care
- end stage renal disease
- minimally invasive
- newly diagnosed
- mental health
- metabolic syndrome
- ejection fraction
- type diabetes
- adipose tissue
- case report
- squamous cell carcinoma
- depressive symptoms
- patient reported
- glycemic control
- prognostic factors
- patient reported outcomes
- chronic kidney disease
- sleep quality