Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.
Mila PetrovaStephen BarclayPublished in: BMC medical ethics (2019)
Ethics and governance approvals are burdensome for historical reasons and not because of the nature of the task. There are many opportunities to improve their efficiency and analytic depth in an age of innovation, increased connectivity and distributed working. If we continue to work under current systems, we are perpetuating, paradoxically, an unethical system of research approvals by virtue of its wastefulness and impoverished ethical debate.