Logistic Regression-Based Model Is More Efficient Than U-Net Model for Reliable Whole Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Segmentation.
Henry DieckhausRozanna MeijboomSerhat OkarTianxia WuPrasanna ParvathaneniYair MinaSiddharthan ChandranAdam D WaldmanDaniel S ReichGovind NairPublished in: Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI (2022)
These results demonstrate that classical machine learning methods can produce more accurate brain segmentation than the far more complex deep learning methods when only small or moderate amounts of training data are available (n ≤ 15). The magnitude of this advantage varies by tissue and cohort, while U-Net may be preferable for deep gray matter and necrotic/non-enhancing tumor segmentation, particularly with larger training data sets (n ≥ 20). Given that segmentation models often need to be retrained for application to novel imaging protocols or pathology, the bottleneck associated with large-scale manual annotation could be avoided with classical machine learning algorithms, such as C-DEF.
Keyphrases
- deep learning
- machine learning
- convolutional neural network
- artificial intelligence
- big data
- magnetic resonance imaging
- high resolution
- white matter
- electronic health record
- resting state
- computed tomography
- cerebral ischemia
- high intensity
- functional connectivity
- virtual reality
- magnetic resonance
- blood brain barrier
- diffusion weighted imaging
- brain injury