Analysis of clinical outcome and postoperative organ function effects in a propensity-matched comparison between conventional and minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Despite an inherent learning curve, minimally invasive MV surgery guarantees a clinical outcome and MV repair quality, at least non-inferior to those of MV surgery via sternotomy. Notwithstanding longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest times, the impact on secondary organ function is negligible, except for a lower systemic inflammatory response. The postoperative increase of CK-enzymes suggestive for enhanced rhabdomyolysis needs to be accounted for when procedural times tend to exceed the critical time threshold for severe limb ischemia.